Court Approved Legal Notice Experian

November 12, 2021

• Health Equity Remains a Priority for the Center for Medicare and... by: Matthew M. Shatzkes and Ehiguina L. Borha
• SEC Halts DAO's Registration of Two Stable Tokens as Securities,... by: Karen J. Garnett
• Court Rejects Challenge to West Virginia Private Employer's Mandatory... by: Marla N. Presley and Laura C. Bunting
• Banking Agencies: Mortgage Servicers Should Prepare For Increased... by: Moorari Shah and A.J. S. Dhaliwal
• Beltway Buzz, November 12, 2021 by: James J. Plunkett
• Federal Court in Minnesota finds Choice of Law Provision... by: Kurt A. Kappes and Chris Cruz
• Federal Circuit Affirms Dismissal of Hatch-Waxman Defendants for Lack... by: Adam P. Samansky and Peter J. Cuomo
• New Commissioner Appointed to lead CA DFPI: Cloey Hewlett by: Moorari Shah and A.J. S. Dhaliwal
• Why People Aren't Hiring Lawyers Anymore (and What You Can do to... by: Sarah Bottorff
• Get to the Point: OSHA's New Rule on Mandatory COVID-19 Vaccination by: John E. Pueschel
• Immigration Weekly Round-Up: Borders Reopen to Millions of Travelers... by: William C. Menard
• DOJ Announces New Guidance for Prosecuting Corporate Crime in Speech... by: Lindsey Olson Collins
• Employee Retention Credit Terminated Early Retroactive to Oct. 1 by... by: Marvin A. Kirsner
• 2022 Employee Benefit Plan Limits Announced by IRS by: Susan E. Stoffer and Ann E. Murray
• FRANK SPEECH: MyPillow Caught in Robotext Lawsuit Alleging Consumers... by: Eric J. Troutman
• The Nonqualified Financial Property Limitation by: Steven Hadjilogiou and Keith Hagan
• DHS Settlement Will Benefit L-2 and H-4 EAD Workers by: Angel Feng and Shannon N. Parker
• China to Revoke Patent Agencies' Licenses for Filing Abnormal Patent... by: Aaron Wininger
• Fast Times at the NLRB: The Labor Board Targets Spicoli by: David J. Pryzbylski
• 10 States Sue Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Over COVID-19... by: Michael R. Bertoncini and Sarah R. Skubas
• McDermottPlus Check-Up: November 12, 2021 by: Health Care Industry Practice Group
• NLRB General Counsel Issues Guidance on Bargaining Obligations under... by: Ahmad Chehab and Robert T. Zielinski
• IRS Provides Guidance to LB&I Examiners on Requesting... by: Andrew R. Roberson and Kevin Spencer
• New York State Requires Private Employers to Notify Employees of... by: Hunton Andrews Kurth's Privacy and Cybersecurity
• Copyright for Creators of Content (And Those That Make Money From It) by: Jeanne Hamburg
• Reckless "Chameleon Carriers" Wreak Havoc on our Highways by: Ian S. Abovitz
• Mezhprom v Lenux (2021) : When Should Offshore Trustees Participate... by: Lynsey McIntyre
• The Broadband Equity, Access & Deployment Program (BEAD): $42.45... by: Telecommunications Practice Group
• Out with Lonergan, In with Spearin: Texas Legislature Provides... by: Justin T. Scott
• Required Amendments for Cafeteria Plan and FSA Plan Changes Permitted... by: Al Ward and Kirsten L. Vignec
• FTC Recommends Steps to Protect Against Ransomware by: Hunton Andrews Kurth's Privacy and Cybersecurity
• Food Fairness Act: Protecting Small Businesses by: Food and Drug Law at Keller and Heckman
• Build Back Better Act I, II, III: Current Version and Trusts and... by: Christopher M. Floss
• Plaintiffs Succeed In Arguing That They Suffered No Injury! by: Keith Paul Bishop
• EU Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism Proposal and Its Relationship... by: Dr. Martin Hamer and Edoardo Gambaro
• NLRB Says Employers Covered by OSHA ETS Have Options, Triggering Duty... by: Steven M. Swirsky and Adam S. Forman
• The Supply Chain Pandemic Continues: What Has Changed and What to... by: Robert C. Gabrielski
• DHS Settlement Expands Employment Authorization Benefits for L-2 and... by: Jennifer Cory and Susan Waller Ramos
• New Standard-Setting Body for Climate Change Disclosures Announced at... by: Jacob H. Hupart
• Recent Settlements Highlight Government Enforcement of Laws Against... by: Raymond G. Lahoud
• Don't Use "Build Back Better" to Sabotage the False Claims Act by: Stephen M. Kohn
• USCIS Settlement Agreement Provides Some Relief to H-4 and L-2 Spouse... by: Melina V. Villalobos and Ayumary M. Fitzgerald
• Not-So-Free Shipping: Yeezy Brand to Pay Us$950,000 Over Late... by: Melissa J. Tea and Kelsi E. Robinson
• 2021 Guide: The Importance of Online Reviews for Law Firms by: Sarah Bottorff
• Wisconsin Law Enforcement Agencies Have New Recordkeeping and Sharing... by: Ryan P. Heiden and Audrey R. Merkel
• Hydrogen Rising: It Really Is Infrastructure Week! Congress Passes... by: David L. Wochner and Laurie B. Purpuro

California District Court Certifies FCRA Class Action Against Experian after Servicer Went out of Business

In a case originally filed in March 2016, and following the successful appeal of a grant of summary judgment in favor of Experian Information Solutions, Inc. ("Experian"), Judge Andrew Guilford of the United States District Court for the Central District of California certified a class of consumers whose reporting by Experian was allegedly "misleading" after a loan servicer went out of business.

Delbert Services Corporation ("Delbert") was a servicer for internet loans issued by Western Sky Financial, LLC. In January 2015, Delbert went out of business and told Experian that it wanted to "discontinue use of any and all services provided by Experian."  Experian responded that it had deleted all Delbert loans from its database. In reality, however, Experian continued to report the loans until April 2016.

In the Complaint, plaintiff Demeta Reyes alleged a single claim for relief under the Fair Credit Reporting Act of 1970 ("FCRA"), 15 U.S.C. § 1681 et seq. Specifically, she asserted that Experian willfully failed to "follow reasonable procedures to assure maximum possible accuracy of the information" contained in her credit report. See 15 U.S.C. §§ 1681e(b), 1681n(a).

Experian filed a motion for summary judgment, arguing that it was entitled to summary judgment because (1) its "reporting of [Plaintiff's] loan was at all times indisputably accurate."; and (2) even assuming aprima facie case of inaccuracy, there was no evidence of a "willful" violation. Judge Guilford agreed, finding that Experian's reporting of plaintiff's loan was "neither patently inaccurate nor unduly misleading." He granted summary judgment on October 13, 2017

The Ninth Circuit, however, reversed Judge Guilford.  In an unreported opinion, it found that plaintiff raised a genuine issue of material fact as to whether Experian's continued reporting of plaintiff's loan was "misleading in such a way and to such an extent that it can be expected to adversely affect credit decisions." It found that when Experian was reporting an account from the defunct Delbert, it was reporting an account that was no longer verifiable and that plaintiff could not make current since Delbert was no longer in business.  Also, Experian continued to report plaintiff's past-due history, but had deleted her positive payment history.  The Ninth Circuit found that a reasonable jury could conclude that Experian's continued reporting of plaintiff's account, "either on its own, or coupled with the deletion of portions of [plaintiff]'s positive payment history on the same loan, was materially misleading."

On remand, plaintiff requested certification of the following class, "All persons whose Experian consumer report contained an account from Delbert Services Corp. reflecting delinquency on a loan originated by Western Sky Financial, LLC after January 21, 2015 . . . ."  Judge Guilford certified the class on October 3, 2019.

The case is Demeta Reyes v. Experian Information Solutions Inc., case number 8:16-cv-00563, in the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California.

Copyright © 2021 Womble Bond Dickinson (US) LLP All Rights Reserved. National Law Review, Volume IX, Number 280

• Printer-friendly
• Email this Article
• Download PDF
• REPRINTS & PERMISSIONS

TRENDING LEGAL ANALYSIS

---

John Hawk is a skilled litigator with over a decade of experience serving the complex and diverse litigation needs of Fortune 500 companies and smaller lenders. He focuses his practice on consumer finance, lender liability and insurance.

Specifically, John routinely defends cases brought pursuant to ERISA, FCRA, TCPA and FDCPA. His clients include life and disability insurance companies, banks and other lenders, and mortgage servicers.

John's experience includes frequent appearances in state and federal courts, including the South Carolina Court of Appeals and the Supreme...

Court Approved Legal Notice Experian

Source: https://www.natlawreview.com/article/california-district-court-certifies-fcra-class-action-against-experian-after

Share this post